Service Learning, Gender and ICT. From gender inequality in ICT to the generation of technological vocations in the education

Autores/as

  • Núria Vergés Bosch Universidat de Barcelona. España Autor/a
  • Leon Freude Universidat de Barcelona. España Autor/a
  • Clara Camps Calvet Universidat de Barcelona / Universidat de Gerona. España Autor/a
  • Ana Antonia Collado Sevilla Universidat de Barcelona. España Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.885

Palabras clave:

ICT Inclusion, Education, Sociology, Service Learning, Feminisms

Resumen

Despite the efforts in recent decades, gender inequalities concerning access to ICT studies and jobs persist. Although women’s exclusion from ICT relates to multiple causes, the research emphasizes on the need to encourage girls’ interest to generate more technological vocations among pupils from school age and, increase the number of female ICT students and workers in the future. To respond to this need, we designed and implemented a Service Learning (SL) project in the field of Sociology of Genders at the University of Barcelona. The project consisted in holding conference-workshops on gender and technology for schools working on issues of gender inequality, gender socialization and making women more visible in ICT, as well as indicate ways to access jobs in ICT. In this article, we delve into the experience of four consecutive courses and present our main results. For the description and evaluation, we apply a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative methodology. On the one hand, we have the self-reflection reports of our participating university students, on the other hand, the surveys of 284 high school pupils and their teachers. With some limitations, the experience has been very satisfactory, for both the teaching staff and the participating students. The results show that SL from a gender perspective has great potential for learning, as well as for social and gender transformation.

Referencias

Bach, R., & Weinzimmer, J. (2011). Exploring the benefits of community-based research in a sociology of sexualities course. Teaching Sociology, 39(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10390647

Biglia, B., & Vergés Bosch, N. (2016). Questioning the gender perspective in research. Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2016.9.2922

Blouin, D., & Perry, Evelyn M. (2009). Whom does service learning really serve? Community-based organizations’ perspectives on service learning, Teaching Sociology, 37(2), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0092055X0903700201

Castaño, C., & Webster, J. (2014). Género, ciencia y tecnologías de la información. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.

Chesler, M., & Vasques Scalera, C. (2000). Race and Gender Issues Related to Service-Learning Research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, (1),18-27.

Cohoon, Joanne. M., & Aspray, W. (2006). Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (Vol. 1). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Saez-Martinez, F. J. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation, 15(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149

Domínguez Amorós, M., & Simó Solsona, M. (2003). Tècniques d’investigació social quantitatives. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.

Donahue, D. M. (2018). Service‐Learning in Higher Education by, for, and about LGBTQ People. In DE Lund (Ed.), The Wiley International Handbook of S-L for Social Justice (pp. 123-144). Hoboken: Wiley.

Dugger, K. (2008). Introduction. In Dugger, K., & Towson, K. (Eds.), Handbook on Service Learning in Women’s Studies and the Disciplines (pp.1-6). Institute for Teaching and Research on Women.

Eudey, Betsy. (2012). Civic engagement, cyberfeminism, and online learning: Activism and service learning in Women’s and Gender Studies courses. Feminist Teacher, 22(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.22.3.0233

European Comission (2019) Women in Digital Scoreboard 2019. Spain. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

European Comission (2020). Índice de la Economía y la sociedad digitales (DESI 2020) Country report Spain. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union

European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2016). Gender in education and training. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2017). Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU: EU and EU Member States overviews. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

European Parliament (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labour market — IP/A/EMPL/2014-13.

Evans, S. Y., Ozer, J, & Hill, H. (2006). Major Service: Combining Academic Disciplines and Service-Learning in Women’s Studies, Feminist Teacher, 17(1), 1-14.

Garoutte, Lisa (2018). The Sociological Imagination and Community-based Learning: Using an Asset-based Approach. Teaching Sociology, 46(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X17750453

Gil-Juárez, A., Vitores, A., Feliu, J. & Vall-Llobera, M. (2011). Brecha digital de género. Una revisión y una propuesta. Teoría de la Educación, 12(2), 25-53.

González Ramos, A. M., Vergés Bosch, N., & Martínez García, J. S. (2017). Women in the technology labour market, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 159(159), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.159.73

Hand, S., Rice, L., & Greenlee, E. (2017). Exploring teachers’ and students’ gender role bias and students’ confidence in STEM fields. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 929-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9408-8

Hochschild, T. R. Jr., Farley, M., & Chee, V. (2014). Incorporating sociology into community service classes. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X13510210

Hua Fletcher, E., & Piemonte N. M. (2017). Navigating the Paradoxes of Neoliberalism: Quiet Subversion in Mentored S-L for the Pre-Health Humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities, 38(4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-017-9465-1

Huisman, K. (2010). Developing a sociological imagination by doing sociology: A methods-based S-L course on women and immigration. Teaching sociology, 38(2), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10364013

López Roldán, P. & Fachelli, S. (2015). Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

López-Sáez, M., Puertas, S., & Sáinz, M. (2011). Why don’t girls choose technological studies? Adolescents’ stereotypes and attitudes towards studies related to medicine or engineering. The Spanish journal of psychology, 14(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.6

Luxán Serrano, M., & Biglia, B. (2011). Pedagogía cyberfeminísta: Entre utopía y realidades. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 12(2), 149-183.

Maceira, H. M. (2017). Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU. Intereconomics, 52(3), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0669-4

Manning-Ouellette, A., Friesen, L. K., & Parrott, A. (2018). A WiSE Approach: How Service-Learning Influences First-Year Women in STEM. Journal of The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 30(2), 97-113.

Marullo, S., Moayedi R., & Cook, D. (2009). C. Wright Mills’s friendly critique of service learning and an innovative response: Cross-institutional collaborations for community-based research. Teaching Sociology, 37(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0903700106

Martin, J. L., & Beese A. J. (2016). Girls talk back: changing school culture through feminist and S-L pedagogies. The High School Journal, 99(3), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2016.0007

Martínez Martín, I. (2016). Construcción de una pedagogía feminista para una ciudadanía transformadora y contra-hegemónica. Foro de Educación, 14(20), 129-151.

Martínez Miguélez, M. (2006). Validez y confiabilidad en la metodología cualitativa. Paradigma, 27(2), 7-33.

Mateos, S., & Gómez, C. (2019). Libro Blanco de las mujeres en el ámbito tecnológico. Madrid: Secretaría de Estado para el Avance Digital. Ministerio de Economía y Empresa.

Mitchell, T. D., & Soria, K. M. (2019). Community Engagement Experiences of College Students with Minoritized Sexual and Gender Identities. International Journal of Research on S-L and Community Engagement, 7(1), 11482.

Mobley, C. (2007). Breaking ground: Engaging undergraduates in social change through service learning, Teaching Sociology, 35(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0703500202

Mosatche, H., Matloff-Nieves, S., Kekelis, L., & Lawner, E. (2013). Effective STEM programs foradolescent girls: three approaches and many lessons learned. Afterschool matters, 17, 17-25.

Nielsen, M. W., Bloch, Carter W., & Schiebinger, L. (2018). Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation. Nature human behaviour, 2(10), 726-734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1

Novek Eleanor, M. (1999). S-L is a feminist issue: Transforming communication pedagogy, Women’s studies in communication, 22(2), 230-240.

Oakes, W., Ming-Chien, H., & Zoltowski, C. (2015). Insights from a first-year learning community to achieve gender balance. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-8.

Obiol Francés, S., Almeda, E., Di Nella, D., Pumar Beltrán, N., Ruiz Franco, A., Vergés Bosch, N., & Villar-Aguilés, A. (2020). ¿Una orientación marcada por el género? El caso de la Formación Profesional Básica valenciana. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación (RASE), 13(3), 371-391.

Ortiz Monera, R. M., & Morero Beltrán, A. M. (2018). Sociologia, economia i ciència política: guies per a una docència universitària amb perspectiva de gènere. Xarxa Vives d’Universitats.

Palos Rodríguez, J., & Puig Rovira, J. M. (2006). Rasgos pedagógicos del aprendizaje-servicio, Cuadernos de pedagogía, (357), 60-63.

Parker-Gwin, R., & J Beth Mabry. (1998). Service Learning as Pedagogy and Civic Education: Comparing Outcomes for Three Models, Teaching Sociology, 26(4), 276-291.

Reinking, Anni, & Martin, Barbara (2018). The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: Theories, Movements, and Ideas to Engage Girls in STEM. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.271

Rissola, G., & Sörvik, J. (2018). Digital Innovation Hubs in Smart Specialisation Strategies. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Rondini, A. C. (2015). Observations of critical consciousness development in the context of service learning. Teaching Sociology, 43(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X15573028

Rooks, D. & Winkler, C. (2012). Learning interdisciplinarity: Service learning and the promise of interdisciplinary teaching, Teaching Sociology, 40(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X11418840

Ruiz-Jiménez, J. M., & Fuentes-Fuentes, M. M. (2016). Management capabilities, innovation, and gender diversity in the top management team: An empirical analysis in technology-based SMEs. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.003

Sáinz, M., Palmén, R., & García-Cuesta, S. (2012). Parental and secondary school teachers’ perceptions of ICT professionals, gender differences and their role in the choice of studies. Sex roles, 66(3-4), 235-249.

Sáinz, M. (2011). Factors which influence girls’ orientations to ICT subjects in schools. Evidence from Spain. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(2), 387-406.

Seethaler, I. C. (2014). Feminist service learning: Teaching about oppression to work toward social change. Feminist Teacher, 25(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.25.1.0039

Shukla Pradip, K., & Shukla, Monica P. (2014). An analysis of gender and major differences upon undergraduate student attitudes about community service learning, Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 7(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v7i1.8310

UNESCO. (2019). Descifrar el código: la educación de las niñas y las mujeres en ciencias, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas (STEM). Paris: Francia 2019.

Verd, J. M., i Barranco Font, O., & Moreno Colom, S. (2007). El análisis de los procesos de trabajo mediante métodos etnográficos: el caso del trabajo administrativo de consultas externas hospitalarias. Papers: revista de sociologia, 145-168.

Verd Pericás, J. M., & López Roldán, P. (2008). La eficiencia teórica y metodológica de los diseños multimétodo. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (16), 13-42.

Vergés Bosch, N. (2019). Gender and ICT: Are we making progress in CyberFeministisation? Revista idees. Feminisme(s), 47, 1-8.

Vergés, N., Cruells, E., & Hache, A. (2009). Viejos Retos y Nuevas potencialidades para las mujeres en la participación del desarrollo de la sociedad de la información. Revista Feminismo/s, 14, 163-182. https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2009.14.10

Vergés Bosch, N. (2012). De la exclusión a la autoinclusión de las mujeres en las TIC. Motivaciones, posibilitadores y mecanismos de autoinclusión. Athenea digital, 12(3), 129-150.

Vergés Bosch, N., Freude, L. & Camps Calvet, C. (2019). Service-learning to reflect on gender in universities and schools and boost women’s presence in ICT. En ICERI 2019 Proceedings of ICERI2019 Conference 11th-13th November 2019 (pp. 957-962). Sevilla: IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.0296

Vitores, A., & Gil-Juárez, A. (2016). The trouble with «women in computing»: a critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6), 666-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309

Walker, T. (2000). A feminist challenge to community service: A call to politicize S-L. En BJ Baliet and K Heffernan (eds), The practice of change: Concepts and models for S-L in women’s studies (pp. 25-45). Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education,

Zubillaga Rego, A., & Peletier Espiga, C. (2020). Economia i societat digitals de Catalunya. DESI 2019. Cuadernos Orkestra, 73.

Publicado

2021-07-01

Cómo citar

Service Learning, Gender and ICT. From gender inequality in ICT to the generation of technological vocations in the education. (2021). Foro De Educación, 19(2), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.885

Artículos similares

1-10 de 346

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.