Analysis of the academic and formative perspective of social pedagogy from an international comparative perspective

Authors

  • Àngela Janer Hidalgo Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. España Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.601

Keywords:

social pedagogy, comparative education, academic perspective, formative perspective

Abstract

Currently, social pedagogy still has to face a series of controversial issues that generates a great difficulty in the development of a universally accepted definition. In turn, social pedagogy responds to social, political and cultural approaches in each country, which concept has been used in different contexts with different meanings. Can we talk about conceptual approaches, normative values and shared working methods? This study, which is part of a wider research, aims to provide a qualitative leap towards the construction of a common and universally accepted core of social pedagogy. Two phases of study are presented: 1) an analysis of the vision of academic experts of social pedagogy through a Delphi process, where has been define, validated and agreed the most important dimensions of social pedagogy (contextual, historical, epistemological, functional, professional); 2) a descriptive analysis of the current training offer in social pedagogy in the best universities in different countries. The contents of curricula have been analyzed according to the dimensions of social pedagogy defined by academic experts. The results indicate that there is a concordance between what the academics say and the formative contents in relation to the political, ethical and social dimension of the context; the variety of intervention areas and the use of methodologies. On the contrary, the epistemological, professional, historical and functional dimensions have little presence in the contents of university studies of social pedagogy.

References

Cameron, C., & Moss, P. (Eds.). (2011). Social Pedagogy and Working with Children and Young People: Where Care and Education Meet. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Caride, J.A. (2004). ¿Qué añade lo «social» al sustantivo «Pedagogía»? [What adds the «social» to the noun «Pedagogy»?]. Revista interunivesitaria, 11, 55-85. Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2015, de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=135015179004

Coussée, F., Bradt, L., Roose, R., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2010). The emerging social, pedagogical paradigma in UK Child and Youth Care: Deus ex machina or walking the beaten path. British Journal of Social Work, 40(3), 789-805. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn147

CGCEES. (2013). La profesión de la Educación Social en Europa. Estudio Comparado (Consejo General de Colegios de Educadoras y Educadores Sociales). Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2015, de http://www.eduso.net/res/pdf/17/profesioneseneuropa2013.pdf

Eichsteller, G., & Holthoff, S. (2012). The Art of Being a Social Pedagogue: Developing Cultural Change in Children’s Homes in Essex. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 1(1), 30-46. Recuperado el 10 de febrero de 2015, de http://www.internationaljournalofsocialpedagogy.com

Eriksson, L. (2014). Understandings of Social Pedagogy from northern European perspectives. Jounal of Social Work, 14(2), 165-182. doi: 10.1177/1468017313477325

Godet, M. (1996). Manuel de Prospective Strategique. Dunod: Paris.

Guix, J. (2003). «P < 0,05 sí, pero...»: la aplicación de la metodología cualitativa en la investigación sanitaria. Revista Calidad Asistencial, 18(1), 55-58. doi: 10.1016/S1134-282X(03)77573-3

Hämäläinen, J. (2003). The concept of social pedagogy in the field of social work. Journal of Social Work, 3, 69-80. doi: 10.1177/1468017303003001005

Hämäläinen, J. (2012). Social Pedagogical Eyes in the Midst of Diverse Understandings, Conceptualizations and Activities. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 1(1), 3-16.

Hämäläinen, J. (2015). Defining Social Pedagogy: Historical, Theoretical and Practical Considerations. British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 1022-1038. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct174

Hämäläinen, J., & Eriksson, L. (2016). Social Pedagogy in Finland and Sweden: a comparative analysis. Pedagogía social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 27, 71-93. doi: 10.7179/PSRI_2016.27.07

Janer, A., & Úcar, X. (2016). Analysing the dimensions of social pedagogy from an international perspective. European Journal of Social Work, 20(2), 203-218. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2016.1188782.

Janer, A., & Úcar, X. (2017). An international comparative analysis about the training of Social Pedagogy at universities. Journal of Social Work (“in press”).

Kornbeck, J., & Rosendal, N. (Eds.). (2009). The Diversity of Social Pedagogy in Europe. Studies in Comparative Social Pedagogies and International Social Work and Social Policy. Bremen: EuropäischerHochschulverlag.

Kornbeck, J., & Rosendal, N. (Eds.). (2012). Social Pedagogy for the Entire Lifespan II. Bremen: EVH/Academicpress GmbH.

Kornbeck, J. (2014). Alternatives to Convergence?: Social work and social pedagogy in higher education (1989-2004) and the question of Europeanisation. Bremen: EHV Academic Press.

Kornbeck, J., & Úcar, X. (Eds.). (2015). Latin American Social Pedagogy: relaying concepts, values and methods between Europe and the Americas?. Studies in Comparative Social pedagogies and International Social Work and Social Policy. Bremen: EVH Academicpress GmbH.

Krichesky, M. (2010). Pedagogía social: un campo disciplinar en construcción. Un desarrollo curricular incipiente y una práctica con historia. In Anales del III Congreso Internacional de Pedagogía Social. São Paulo (Brasil). Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2015, de http://www.proceedings.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=MSC0000000092010000100019&lng=es&nrm=iso

Landeta, J. (1999). El método Delphi. Una técnica de previsión para la incertidumbre. Barcelona: Ariel.

Lorenz, W. (2008). Paradigms and politics: Understanding methods paradigms in an historical context: The Case of Social Pedagogy. British Journal of Social Work, 38(4), 625-644. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn025

March, M., Orte, C., & Ballester, L. (2016). La Pedagogía social en España: de la reconstrucción académica y profesional a la incerteza científica y social. Pedagogía social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 27, 95-132.

Mátel, A., & Preissová, A. (2016). Convergent and Divergent Aspects of Social Work and Social Pedagogy. Časopis Sociální pedagogika, 1(4), 72-86.

Němec, J. (Ed.). (2016). Nedořešený hlavolam: Sociální pedagogika a/versus Sociální práce. Časopis Sociální pedagogika/Social Education, 4(1).

Orte, C., Ballester, L., Vives, M., & Amer, J. (2015). El uso de la técnica Delphi en la evaluación sobre el rol de los formadores en los programas de educación familiar. In AIDIPE (Ed.), Investigar con y para la sociedad (pp. 1745-1762). España: Bubok.

Ortega, J., Caride, J.A., & Úcar, X. (2013). La Pedagogía social en la formación-profesionalización de los educadores y las educadoras sociales, o de cuando el pasado construye. RES. Revista de Educación Social, 17, 1-24. Recuperado el 20 de setiembre de 2015, de http://www.eduso.net/res/pdf/17/ps_res_17.pdf

Otto, H. (2006). Social pedagogy and social work: evolution and perspectivas?. In Proceedings of the I Congresso Internacional de Pedagogia Social. São Paulo (Brasil).

Petrie, P., Boddy, J., Cameron, C., Heptinstall, E., McQuail, S., Simon, A., & Wigfall, V. (2009). Pedagogy- a holistic, personal approach to work with children and young people, across services. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit. University of London.

Ribas Machado, E. (2013). O desenvolvimento da Pedagogia Social sobre a perspectiva comparada: estágio atual no contexto iberoamericano (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de São Paulo, Brasil. Recuperado el 20 de setiembre de 2015, de www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/48/.../tde.../ERICO_RIBAS_MACHADO_rev.pdf

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2012). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects. Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1487- 1498. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002

Smith, M. (2012). Social Pedagogy from a Scottish Perspective. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 1(1), 46-55. Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2015, de http://www.internationaljournalofsocialpedagogy.com

Storø, J. (2012). The Difficult Connection between Theory and Practice in Social Pedagogy. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 1(1), 17-29. Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2015, de http://www.internationaljournalofsocialpedagogy.com

Úcar, X. (2012). The Diversity of Social Pedagogy in Europe (Studies in Comparative Social Pedagogies and International Social Work and Social Policy, Vol. VII). European Journal of Social Work, 15(5), 734-736. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.750501

Úcar, X. (2013). Exploring different perspectives of Social Pedagogy: towards a complex and integrated approach. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(36), 1-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v21n36.2013

Van Ewijk, H. (2010). Positioning Social Work in a Socially Sensitive Society. Social Work & Society, 8(1), 22-31. Recuperado el 15 de junio de 2015, de http://www.socwork.net/2010/1/vanewijk

Published

2019-01-01

Issue

Section

Studies

How to Cite

Analysis of the academic and formative perspective of social pedagogy from an international comparative perspective. (2019). Foro De Educación, 17(26), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.601

Similar Articles

1-10 of 378

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.