Principle of progressive autonomy, participation, and recognition of agency. Substantive citizenship in the transition from childhood to adolescence

Authors

  • Marta Beatriz Esteban Universidad de Barcelona. España Author
  • Ana Maria Novella Universidad de Barcelona. España Author
  • Miquel Martínez Universidad de Barcelona. España Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.929

Keywords:

Progressive autonomy, Agency, Substantive citizenship, Participation, Youth

Abstract

It is necessary to talk about children's and adolescents' education for citizenship beyond the vindication of spaces for citizen action. It is necessary to incorporate the principle of progressive autonomy highlighted by the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989 in terms of 'evolving capacities', from the knowledge of their rights and their exercise. This article aims to analyse the concept of substantive citizenship of children and adolescents based on their right to participation and from the recognition of their agency, as well as the promotion of and respect for the principle of progressive autonomy. Based on a participatory narrative research with a socio-critical perspective, 23 discussion groups were carried out with 210 young people between 15 and 19 years old in five Iberoamerican cities: Barcelona, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Madrid and Sao Paolo. From the content analysis of their contributions, three dimensions emerge: to know oneself as a subject of rights from the knowledge of these rights, the importance of intergenerational relations in recognising progressive autonomy, and the incidence of age in the development of their autonomy. As conclusions, it should be noted that young people in the five cities know their rights and recognise that family, school and social networks favour their recognition as subjects of rights and responsibilities. It also reveals that age is a limiting element and a fundamental factor for the development of substantive citizenship.

References

Actions for the Rights of Children. (2001). Foundations. Child and Adolescent Development. Save the Children Alliance.

Bratman, M. E. (2007). Structures of agency: Essays. Oxford University Press.

Benedicto, J., & Moran, M. L. (2002). La construcción de una ciudadanía activa entre los jóvenes. Instituto de la Juventud. http://www.injuve.es/sites/default/files/LA%20CONSTRUCCION.pdf

Boddy, C. (2005). A rose by any other name may smell as sweet but 'group discussion' is not another name for a 'focus group' nor should it be. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(3), 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510603325

Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.) Agency. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved on June 22 2021.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/agency

Carmona Luque, M. D. (2011). La convención sobre los derechos del niño. Instrumento de progresividad en el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Editoral Dykinson.

Díaz Arce, S. R. (2019). Infancia, derechos humanos y ciudadanía. Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos, 30(2).

https://doi.org/10.15359/rldh.30-2.3

Díaz Bórquez, D., Bozo Carrillo, N., & Contreras Shats, N. (2019). Calidad de la participación infantil en la Política Local de Infancia Chilena. Revista Trabajo Social, (91), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7764/rts.91.1-17

Dworkin, R. (1984). Taking Rights Seriously (Marta Guastavino, trad.). Editorial Ariel.

Edmonds, R. (2019). Making children's 'agency visible: Towards the localisation of a concept in theory and practice. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860994

Erstad, O., Miño, R., & Rivera-Vargas, P. (1988). Prácticas educativas para transformar y conectar escuelas y comunidades. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 29(66), 21-31. I https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-01

Etchebehere Arenas, G. (2012). Puentes y brechas entre educación inicial y derechos de infancia. UDELAR.

https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12008/4549/1/Psico-Echebehere_2013-04-19.pdf

Gallagher, M. (2006). Spaces of participation and inclusion. In E. Kay Tisdall, John M. Davis, Alan Prout & Malcolm Hill (Eds.), Children, young people and social inclusion: Participation for what, (pp.159-178). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861346629.003.0009

Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analysing qualitative data. Sage.

Gómez de la Torre Vargas, M. (2018). Las implicancias de considerar al niño como sujeto de derecho. Revista De Derecho, (18), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.22235/rd.v18i2.1703

González Coto, M. (2012). La agencia de la niña y el niño en la condición pre-ciudadana. Revista Electrónica ‘Actualidades Investigativas en Educación’, 12(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15517/AIE.V12I2.10287

Gros, B. (2008) Aprendizajes, conexiones y artefactes. La producción colaborativa del conocimiento. Gedisa.

Lansdown, G. (2005). The Evolving Capacities of the Child, Innocenti Insights no. 11. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/384-the-evolving-capacities-of-the-child.html

Liebel, M. (2018). Welfare or Agency? Children's Interests as Foundation of Children's Rights. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 26(4), 597-625. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02604012

Massot, I., Dorio, I., & Sabariego, M. (2009). Estrategias de recogida y análisis de la información. En R. Bisquerra (Coord.), Metodología de la investigación educativa (pp. 329-366). La Muralla.

Mühlbacher, S., & Sutterlüty, F. (2019). The principle of child autonomy: A rationale for the normative agenda of childhood studies. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860999

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.

Observatorio Niñez y Adolescencia. (2020, 28 de octubre). Autonomía progresiva y ejercicio de derechos [Boletín no 16]. http://www.achnu.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Boletin6_VB_12jul.pdf

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., Dickinson, W. B., & Zoran, A. G. (2011). Un marco cualitativo para la recolección y análisis de datos en la investigación basada en grupos focales. Paradigmas: Una revista Disciplinar de Investigación, 3(2) 127-157.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3798215

Pávez Soto, I., & Sepúlveda Kattan, N. (2019). Concepto de agencia en los estudios de infancia. Una revisión teórica. Sociedad e Infancias, (3), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.5209/soci.63243

Quiroga, H. (2000). ¿Democracia procedimental o democracia sustantiva? La opción por un modelo de integración. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), 6(3), 361-374.

https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28060302

Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., & García Jiménez, E. (1999). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Aljibe.

Rodríguez-Moriche, M. P., & Vallejo-Jiménez, S.I. (2019). Nuevos horizontes de ocio y participación infantil: construyendo ciudadanía desde los intereses y necesidades de los niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA). In Ocio y participación social en entornos comunitarios (pp. 213-233). Universidad de La Rioja.

Sen, A. (1997). Choice, welfare and measurement. Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

Sutterlüty, F., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2019). Agency, autonomy and self-determination: Questioning key concepts of childhood studies. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860992

The United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Treaty Series, 1577, 3.

Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children's participation. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 15(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1163/092755607X206489

Urdaneta Carruyo, E., & Dairy Salcedo, R. (2014). Janusz Korczak. Ejemplo de devoción sin límite. Gaceta Médica de México, 150(s3), 388-391. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/gaceta/gm-2014/gms143s.pdf

Uriarte, C. (2013). La cuestión de la responsabilidad en el derecho penal juvenil. In Carolina González Laurino, Sandra Leopold Costábile, Laura López Gallego & Pablo Martinis (Eds.), Los sentidos del castigo: el debate uruguayo sobre la responsabilidad en la infracción adolescente (pp.141-162). Udelar, CISC.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334429693_La_cuestion_de_la_responsabilidad_respecto_a_las_conductas_infractoras_judicializadas_de_adolescentes_en_Uruguay

Valentine, K. (2011). Accounting for agency. Children & Society, 25(5), 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00279.x

Zavala Berbena, M. A., & Castañeda Figueiras, S. C. (2014). Fenomenología de agencia y educación. Notas para el análisis del concepto de agencia humana y sus proyecciones en el ámbito educativo. Magister, 26(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6796(14)70024-6

Downloads

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Principle of progressive autonomy, participation, and recognition of agency. Substantive citizenship in the transition from childhood to adolescence. (2022). Foro De Educación, 20(1), 134-157. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.929

Similar Articles

31-40 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.