The Nuffield Physics Ordinary-level Curriculum Project in the 1960s: a Transnational Project?

Gary McCulloch

doi:10.14201/32zj6a75

Authors

Gary McCulloch UCL Institute of Education London. UK Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14201/32zj6a75

Keywords:

Physics, science, curriculum, transnational, inquiry, teachers

Abstract

The Nuffield Physics curriculum project was the first national curriculum project held in the UK. The Ordinary-level Nuffield physics project, developed between 1962 and 1966 for academic pupils in grammar schools, was one of the most interesting and innovative projects of the 1960s. It had many transnational features, with influences of ideas and practices running across national borders, as well as national characteristics. It owed many of its distinctive ideas around physics for the inquiring mind to Eric Rogers, and ultimately to the progressive school Bedales in the 1920s and 1930s, as well as American reform under the banner of the Physical Science Study Committee. These were played out at a local level, for example in Worcester, led by Ted Wenham and John Lewis. During and after the project, although there was some resistance to sharing these ideas as they developed, key figures began to engage with other national systems and projects in spreading the word about Nuffield physics. Transnationalism was at the heart of the significance and achievements of Nuffield O-level physics, no less than of its problems and limitations.

References

Argles, M. (1964). South Kensington to Robbins: An Account of English Technical and Scientific Education since 1851. London: Longmans.

Bandyopadhyay, P. C. (1963). Letter to Dr Farrar-Brown, Nuffield Foundation, 19 August (Nuffield Foundation papers, EDU.52).

Becher, R. (1963a). Letter to R. Morris, Ministry of Education, 23 August (NF papers, EDU.52).

Becher, R. (1963b). Memorandum, «Science teaching project: note to organisers», 23 August (NF papers, EDU.52).

Becher, R. (1963c). Margin note on letter from P.C. Bandyopadhyah to R. Becher, 9 October (NF papers, EDU.52).

Boulind, H. (1956). Memorandum of science syllabuses. Conference presented at the Unesco Institute, Hamburg, [22-29 October 1956] (Science Masters Association papers, University of Leeds).

Boyd, W., & Rawson, W. (1965). The Story of the New Education. London: Heinemann.

Collins, P. (2011). The cycle of physics pedagogy. Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6.

Del Pozo Andrés, M. M., & Braster, S. (2018). The power of networks in the marketing of pedagogical ideals: the Dalton Plan in Great Britain (1920-1925). History of Education, 42(6), 840-864.

Estrela, E. (2019). The knowledge of policies: the personal dimension of curriculum policies in Portugal. British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(2), 217-33.

Fuller, K. (1994). Eric Rogers 1902-1990. In Jennison, B., & Ogborn, J. (Eds.), Wonder and Delight: Essays in Science Education (pp. 203-206). Bristol, Institute of Physics.

Fuller, K., & Malvern, D. (2010). Challenge and Change: A History of the Nuffield A-Level Physics Project. Retrieved from centaur.reading.ac.uk/7534/1/Malvern_and_Fuller.pdf

Ingle, R., & Jennings, A. (1981). Science in Schools: Which Way Now? London: Heinemann.

Jenkins, E. (2019). Science for All: The Struggle to Establish School Science in England. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.

Layton, D. (1973). Science for the People: The Origins of the School Science Curriculum in England. London: Allen and Unwin.

Layton, D. (1984). Interpreters of Science: A History of the Association for Science Education. London: John Murray / ASE.

Lewis, J. (n.d.). Memoir, «What fun!: One man’s view of events in the last 30 years» (private).

Lowe, R. (2007). The Death of Progressive Education: How Teachers Lost Control of the Classroom. London: Routledge.

McCulloch, G. (2020). Physics for the enquiring mind: The Nuffield physics Ordinary-level course, 1962-1966. In McCulloch, G. et al. (Eds.), Transnational Perspectives on Curriculum History (pp. 7-40).

McCulloch, G., Goodson, I., & Gonzalez-Delgado, M. (Eds.). (2020). Transnational Perspectives on Curriculum History. London: Routledge.

McCulloch, G., Jenkins, E. W., & Layton, D. (1985). Technological Revolution? The Politics of School Science and Technology in England and Wales since 1945. London: Falmer.

Middleton, S. (2013). Claire Soper’s hat: New Education Fellowship correspondence between Bloomsbury and New Zealand, 1938-1945. History of Education, 42(1), 92-114.

Nuffield Foundation. (n.d.; 1963?). Memorandum, «Science teaching programme: Agencies concerned in school science curriculum reform» (NF papers, EDU.52).

Nuffield Foundation. (1966). Nuffield Physics Teachers’ Guide 1, [Background information: the physics programme: general introduction]. London: Longmans/Penguin Books.

Richards, C. (2019, May 19). The lost legacy of progressive schools. Times Educational Supplement, pp. 18-22.

Rogers. E. (1931a). Letter to J.H. Badley, 25 January 1931 (Rogers papers, Bedales).

Rogers, E. (1931b). Letter to Badley, 10 March 1931 (Rogers papers, Bedales).

Rogers, E. (1931c). Letter to Badley, 30 July 1931 (Rogers papers, Bedales).

Rogers, E. (1932). Letter to Badley, 10 February (Rogers papers, Bedales school).

Rogers, E. (1960). Physics for the Inquiring Mind. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

Rogers, E. (1962). Teaching Physics for the Inquiring Mind. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Rogers, E. (1963a). Letter to T. Wenham, 19 August (Wenham / Fuller papers, in personal possession).

Rogers, E. (1963b). The aims of science teaching in schools. Keynote paper presented at the Commonwealth Conference on the Teaching of Science in Schools, Ceylon, [December (NF papers, EDU.52].

Rogers, E. (1967a). Letter to T. Wenham, 22 February (Wenham / Fuller papers, in personal possession).

Rogers, E. (1967b). Letter to T. Wenham, 14 May (Wenham / Fuller papers).

Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the Classroom: The Cold War Reconstruction of American Science Education. New York: Palgrave.

Safari project. (n.d,; c. 1974). University of East Anglia, memorandum, «The Nuffield Approach».

Simon, B. (1991). Education and the Social Order, 1940-1990. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Simon, J. (2019). The transnational Physical Science Study Committee: the evolving nation in the world of science and education. In Krige, J. (Ed.), How Knowledge Moves: Writing the Transnational History of Science and Technology (pp. 308-342). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tricker, R. A. R. (1961). Impressions of the teaching of science in schools in the United States of America. (Ministry of Education papers, National Archives, ED.147/794).

Waring, M. (1979). Social Pressures and Curriculum Innovation: A Study of the Nuffield Foundation Science Teaching Project. London: Methuen.

Wenham, T. (1961). Physical science in the training college. Contemporary Physics, 2(4), 298-301.

Wenham, T. (n.d.). Note (Wenham / Fuller papers. In private possession).

Williams, C. L. (1964). Letter to Wenham, 2 February (Wenham / Fuller papers, private).

Woolnough, B. (1988). Physics Teaching in Schools 1960-85: Of People, Policy and Power. London: Falmer.

Woolnough, B. (1990). Changes in physics teaching in England since 1960: the people, policies and power in curriculum administration. In Haft, H., & Hopmann, S. (Eds.), Case Studies in Curriculum Administration History (pp. 125-39). London: Falmer.