Teach First as affective governmentality: the shaping of the hyper-performative, affected and committed teacher

Autores/as

  • Patrick Bailey UCL Institute of Education, London. UK Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.820

Palabras clave:

Governmentality, Affect, Power, Foucault, Teach First, Teach For All, Governance, Performativity, Teacher Subjectivity

Resumen

This article presents a Foucauldian and neo-Marxist analysis of the education charity and social enterprise, Teach First. It explores some of the affective, creative, and immaterial practices/technologies whereby this influential organisation creates or fabricates, and attempts to secure, a world of objectivity and meaning, posing and activating corresponding forms of subjectivity and conduct. The analysis addresses some of the diverse forms and modalities of power from which emerges a version of the post-Fordist, neo-liberal teacher subject – an iteration of the teacher characterised by new forms of subjectivity and social relations, which are bound up with changing economic and cultural practices. Moreoever, this article explores Teach First as a form of «affective governmentality», and situates this influential organisation within ongoing, global transformations in the governance of teacher training.

Referencias

Amin, A. (2000). Post-Fordism: Models, Fantasies and Phantoms of Transition. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader (pp. 1-40). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Bailey, P.L.J. (2013). The policy dispositif: historical formation and method. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), pp. 807-827.

Bailey, P.L.J. (2015). Teach First as a dispositif: towards a critical ontology of policy and power. Doctoral thesis, University of London. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1546650/

Bailey, P.L.J. (2015). Consultants of conduct: new actors, new knowledges and new «resilient’ subjectivities in the governing of the teacher. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), pp. 232-250.

Ball, S. (2013). Foucault, Power, and Education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Ball, S.J. (2010). New Voices, New Knowledges and the New Politics of Education Research: the gathering of a perfect storm?. European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 124-137.

Ball, S.J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. London: Routledge.

Bell, D. (2007). The Politics of Fear and the Gospel of life. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 8(2), pp. 55-80.

Dant, T. (2003). Critical Social Theory: Culture, Society and Critique. London: Sage.

Dean, M. (1995). «Governing the unemployed self in an active society’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (4), pp. 559-583.

Dean, M. (1996). «Foucault, government and the enfolding of authority’. In A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (Eds), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 209-229). London: UCL Press Limited.

Dean, M. (2007). Governing Societies. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. (Second Ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Dean, M. (2013). The Signature of Power: Sovereignty, Governmentality and Biopolitics: Sage.

Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972-1990. (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Athlone Pess.

Duzenli, F. E. (2006). Re/presenting Labor: Economic Discourse, Value, and Ethics. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.

Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil.

Foucault, M. (2010). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978-1979. (G. Burchell, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Gillies, D. (2011). Agile bodies: a new imperative in neoliberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), pp. 207-223.

Gilson, E. (2013). The Ethics of Vulnerability: A Feminist Analysis of Social Life and Practice: Routledge.

Hall, S. (1988). Brave New World. Marxism Today (Special Issue), October 1988, pp. 24-29.

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. London: Harvard University Press.

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and Democray in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.

Kelly, P. (2006). «The entrepreneurial self and «youth at-risk’: Exploring the horizons of identity in the twenty-first century’. Journal of youth studies, 9(1), pp. 17-32.

Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial Labour. In M. Hardt and Virno.P. (Eds), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (pp. 133-147). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lazzarato, M. (2003). Struggle, Event, Media. [Online]. Transversal (May 2003). Available at: http://eipcp.net/transversal/1003/lazzarato/en.

Lazzarato, M. (2004). From Capital-Labour to Capital-Life. ephemera: theory and politics in organization, 4(3), pp. 187-208.

Lazzarato, M. (2008). From Knowledge to Belief, from Critique to the Production of Subjectivity. [Online]. Transversal (April 2008). Available at: http://transform.eipcp.net/transversal/0808/lazzarato/en.

Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), pp. 109-133.

Lazzarato, M. (2012). The Making of Indebted Man. (J. D. Jordan, Trans.). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

Massumi, B. (2005). The Future Birth of the Affective Fact, Conference proceedings: Genealogies of Biopolitics.

Meenaghan, T. (1995). The role of advertising in brand image development. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 4(4), pp. 23-34.

Olmedo, A., Bailey, P., & Ball, S.J. (2013). To Infinity and beyond …: Heterarchical Governance, the Teach for All Network in Europe and the Making of Profits and Minds, European Educational Research Journal, https://doi.org/10.2304%2Feerj.2013.12.4.492

O’Malley, P. (1996). Risk and responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (Eds), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 189-208). London: UCL Press Limited.

O’Malley, P. (2010). Resilient subjects: Uncertainty, warfare and liberalism. Economy and Society, 39(4), pp. 488-509.

Peters, M. (2001). Education, Enterprise Culture and the Entrepreneurial Self: A Foucauldian Perspective. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), pp. 58-71.

Reid, J. (2013) Interrogating the neoliberal biopolitics of the sustainable development-resilience nexus. International Political Sociology, 7(4), pp. 353-367.

Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Whitty, G. (2014). Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the «University Project’ in education . Oxford Review of Education, 40(4).

Wigdortz, B. (2012). Success Against the Odds: Five Lessons in How To Achieve the Impossible: The Story of Teach First: Short Books.

Yeatman, A. (1996). The New Contractualism: management reform or a new approach to governance?. In G. Davis and P. Weller (Eds), New Ideas, Better Government. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

Publicado

2021-01-01

Cómo citar

Teach First as affective governmentality: the shaping of the hyper-performative, affected and committed teacher. (2021). Foro De Educación, 19(1), 55-80. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.820

Artículos similares

81-90 de 111

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.