e-ISSN: 1698-7802
DOI prefix: 10.14516/fde
“Foro de Educación founded (2003) and directed (2003-till date) by José Luis Hernández Huerta, and published by FahrenHouse (2003-till date). FahrenHouse: Salamanca, España
The ambivalence of academic writing among design teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.603Keywords:
design, higher education, school discipline, writingAbstract
In the higher education setting, academic writing is a valid way to produce knowledge. Therefore, the design practices, based on a visual language where writing plays an auxiliary role, could be threatened. Using an academic literacies approach, interested in studying what counts as knowledge and who has the authority to produce, the objective of this article is to analyze if design aligns, adapts or resists the academic writing discourse. Utilizing this approach, this article reports the exploratory study results regarding the representations of eleven university teachers of design in respect to academic writing. Through a case study involving teachers working in architecture, graphic design, industrial design and urban design study programs, interviews were thematically analyzed to identify implicit meaning in three specific relationships: writing/reading, writing/student profile, writing/professional field. Ambivalent positions were discovered among the main findings: sometimes, the teachers aligned themselves with the dominant academic writing discourse, while at other times they expressed an almost complete lack of relevance of writing in acquiring proficiency in design. This ambivalence originates in power and authority discourses: academic writing emphasizes the idea that those who produce knowledge necessarily write and exclude other possibilities within design, where communities of practice determine what counts as knowledge according to processes not based in writing.
References
Abric, J-C. (2001). Las representaciones sociales: aspectos teóricos. In Abric, J-C. (Dir.), Prácticas sociales y representaciones (pp. 11-32). Distrito Federal: Ediciones Coyoacán.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
Bazerman, C. (1980). A relationship between reading and writing: the conversational model. College English, 41(6), 656-661.
Bazerman, C. (2012). Writing, cognition, and affect from the perspectives of sociocultural and historical studies of writing. In Berninger, V. (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 89-104). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
Becher, T., & Parry, S. (2005). The endurance of the disciplines. In Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (Eds.), Governing knowledge. A study of continuity and change in higher education (pp. 133-144). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bell, S. (2016). Writing against formal constraints in art and design: making words count. In Archer, A., & Breuer, E. O. (Eds.), Multimodality in higher education (pp. 136-166). Leiden: Brill.
Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Integrating products, processes, purposes and participants in professional writing. In Candlin, C. N., & Hyland, K. (Eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 21-39). Abingdon: Routledge.
Borg, E. (2010). The experience of writing a practice-based thesis in Design. (Tesis inédita de doctorado). University of Leeds, Reino Unido. Recuperado el 15 de octubre de 2016, de: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3745/
Borg, E. (2012). Writing differently in art and design: innovative approaches to writing tasks. In Clughen, L., & Hardy, C. (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines. Building supportive cultures for student writing in UK higher education (pp. 169-186). Bingley: Emerald.
Brandt, D. (1994). Remembering writing, remembering reading. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 459-479.
Bridgstock, R. (2013). Professional capabilities for twenty-first century creative careers: lessons from outstandingly successful Australian artists and designers. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 32(2), 176-189.
Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4-22.
Carillo, E. C. (2015). Securing a place for reading in composition. Colorado: University Press of Colorado.
Carlino, P. (2013). Alfabetización académica diez años después. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 18(57), 355-381.
Castelló, M. (2014). Los retos actuales de la alfabetización académica: estado de la cuestión y últimas investigaciones. Enunciación, 19(2), 346-365.
Cassany, D. (2008). Prácticas letradas contemporáneas. Distrito Federal: Ríos de Tinta.
Cassany, D., & López, C. (2010). De la universidad al mundo laboral: continuidad y contraste entre las prácticas letradas académicas y profesionales. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Alfabetización académica y profesional en el siglo XXI: leer y escribir desde las disciplinas (pp. 347-374). Barcelona: Planeta/Ariel.
Coleman, L. (2015). How drawing is used to conceptualize and communicate design ideas in Graphic Design: exploring scamping through a literacy practice lens. In Lillis, T., Harrington, K., Lea, M. R., & Mitchell, S. (Eds.), Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice (pp. 257-266). Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press.
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49-55.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M. (2003). Issues in academic writing in higher education. In Coffin, C., Curry, M. J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T. M., & Swann, J., Teaching academic writing. A toolkit for higher education (pp. 1-18). Londres: Routledge.
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dormer, P. (1994). The art of the maker. Londres: Thames and Hudson.
Elbow, P. (1993). The war between reading and writing: and how to end it. Rhetoric Review, 12(1), 5-24.
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 29-50.
Francis, P. (2009). Inspiring writing in art and design: taking a line for a write. Bristol: Intellect.
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1-5.
García, V. (2016). Caminos hacia la academia. Relatos de vida, identidad y profesión. Zinacantepec: El Colegio Mexiquense.
Gee, J. P. (1998). What is literacy? In Zamel, V., & Spack, R. (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies. Teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp. 51-59). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gere, A. R. (1985). Introduction. In Gere, A. R. (Ed.), Roots in the sawdust. Writing to learn across the disciplines (pp. 1-8). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Design. In Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (vol. 2, pp. 525-535). San Diego: Academic Press.
Graff, H. J (2010). The literacy myth at thirty. Journal of Social History, 43(3), 635-666.
Herndl, C. G. (1993). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: a critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing. College Composition and Communication, 44(3), 349-363.
Jodelet, D. (1986). La representación social: fenómenos, concepto y teoría. In Moscovici, S., Billing, M., Deconchy, J-P., Farr, R. M., Gilly, M., Graumann, C. F.,... Rouquette, M. L. (Eds.), Psicología social (vol. 2, pp. 469-494). Barcelona: Paidós.
Jodelet, D. (2000). Representaciones sociales: contribución a un saber sociocultural sin fronteras. In Jodelet, D., & Guerrero, A. (Coords.), Develando la cultura. Estudios en representaciones sociales (pp. 7- 30). Distrito Federal: UNAM.
Jones, C., Turner, J., & Street, B. (1999). Introduction. In Jones, C., Turner, J., & Street, B. (Eds.), Students writing in the university. Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. xv-xxiv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kalman, J. (2008). Discusiones conceptuales en el campo de la cultura escrita. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 46, 107-134.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach. In Lea, M., & Street, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: new contexts (pp. 32-46). Buckingham: SRHE/Open University.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The «Academic Literacies» Model: theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368-377.
Liang, C., & Lin, W-S. (2015). The interplay of creativity, imagination, personality traits, and academic performance. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 34(3), 270-290.
Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: access, regulation, desire. Londres: Routledge.
Lillis, T. M., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5-32.
Love, T. (2002). Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: some philosophical issues. Design Studies, 23(3), 345-361.
Melles, G., & Lockheart, J. (2012). Writing purposefully in art and design. Responding to converging and diverging new academic literacies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4(2), 346-362.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Moscovici, S. (1979). El psicoanálisis, su imagen y su público. Buenos Aires: Huemul.
Navarro, F. (2010). ¿Qué son los géneros profesionales? Apuntes teórico-metodológicos para el estudio del discurso profesional, ponencia presentada en el IV Congreso Internacional de Letras. Transformaciones culturales. Debates de la teoría, la crítica y la lingüística en el Bicentenario, Buenos Aires, 22-27 de noviembre de 2010. Recuperado el 6 de mayo de 2016, de: http://www.ungs.edu.ar/prodeac/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Navarro_2012_Que-son-los-generos-profesionales.pdf
Orr, S., & Blythman, M. (2002). The process of design is almost like writing an essay. The Writing Center Journal, 2(2), 39-54.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pevsner, N. (1940/2014). Academies of art: past and present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piña, J. M. (2004). La teoría de las representaciones sociales. Nociones y linderos. In Piña, J. M. (Coord.), La subjetividad de los actores de la educación (pp. 15-54). Distrito Federal: UNAM.
Piña, J. M., & Cuevas, Y. (2004). La teoría de las representaciones sociales. Su uso en la investigación educativa en México. Perfiles Educativos, 26(105-106), 102-124.
Schön, D. A. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos. Hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Barcelona: Paidós.
Shreeve, A., Sims. E., & Trowler, P. (2010). «A kind of exchange»: learning from art and design teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(2), 125-138.
Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Street, B. (2003). What’s «new» in the new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91.
Thienen, J. von, Noweski, Ch., Rauth, I., Meinel, C., & Lang, S. (2012). If you want to know who you are, tell me where you are: the importance of places. In Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (Eds.), Design thinking research. Studying co-creation in practice (pp. 53-73). Heildenberg: Springer.
Thompson, J. (2005). Art education: from Coldstream to QAA. Critical Quarterly, 47(1-2), 215-225.
Thoring, K., Luippold, C., & Mueller, R. M. (2012). Creative space in design education: a typology of spatial functions. Ponencia presentada en la 14th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 6-7 de septiembre de 2012, Antwerp, Bélgica. Recuperado el 23 de enero de 2016, de: https://www.designsociety.org/publication/33233/creative_space_in_design_education_a_typology_of_spatial_functions
Valles, M. S. (2000). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid: Síntesis.
Vargas, A. (2016). La escritura académica en el posgrado: la perspectiva del estudiante. Un estudio de caso. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 14(1), 97-129.
Walker, J. A. (1989). Design history and the history of design. Londres: Pluto Press.
Wang, D., & Ilhan, A. O. (2009). Holding creativity together: a sociological theory of the design professions. Design Issues, 25(1), 5-21.
Wilson, G. (2012). Is academic writing the most appropriate complement to art students’ practice? (Tesis inédita de doctorado). The Open University, Reino Unido. Recuperado el 9 de octubre de 2015, de: http://www.research.ucreative.ac.uk/2020/1/GillWilsonThesis.pdf
Zavala, V. (2009). La literacidad o lo que la gente hace con la lectura y la escritura. In Cassany. D. (Comp.), Para ser letrados. Voces y miradas sobre la lectura (pp. 23-35). Barcelona: Paidós.
Zavala, V., & Córdova, G. (2010). Decir y callar. Lenguaje, equidad y poder en la universidad peruana. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Downloads
Published
2019-01-01
Issue
Section
Studies
How to Cite
The ambivalence of academic writing among design teachers. (2019). Foro De Educación, 17(26), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.603
